MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104230020 · doi:10.1016/0967-0653(93)95883-8

10.1016/0967-0653(93)95883-8

2000· article· en· W2104230020 on OpenAlex
Michael S. Fenster, Robert Dolan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreStatisticGeologyPhysical geographyOceanographyMovement (music)GeographyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shoreline rate-of-change statistic is calculated from sequential measurements of shoreline position. This statistic implicitly represents the cumulative impact of those processes which have influenced shoreline behavior. Knowledge of the phenomenological relationships between the oceanographic processes and the shoreline's response, however, is not required for the computation and utilization of rate-of-change statistics. In this paper we suggest that an understanding of the processes governing shoreline behavior will greatly aid response-centered analyses. This will be true for numerous applications involving shoreline rate-of-change values, especially those which must determine the persistence of short-term deviations from the long-term shoreline trend. Unfortunately, process-response data from most of the world's coastlines are neither synoptic nor of high resolution. In addition, functional relationships between the processes and responses are difficult to quantify due to the synergistic nature of the shoreline processes. For a 7.4 km reach along the Outer Banks, North Carolina, we demonstrate typical problems associated with identifying the principal causes of shoreline movement in a highly dynamic environment. When viewed over the time spans used in shoreline analyses, which utilize remotely-sensed data (~ 10 to 150 years), the spatial continuity of the processes resulting in shoreline movement is limited to relatively narrow geographic segments along the shore. Thus, a single, long-term process, such as sea-level rise, does not appear to dominate shoreline movement over the 134 year record along the Outer Banks. Instead, relatively long-term trends in shoreline movement correspond to cyclic patterns in storm frequency and intensity, and short-term sea-level adjustments. Other processes affecting local sediment budgets, which can be difficult to quantify, include longshore variations in sediment transport and/or variations in the delivery and storage capacity of sources and sinks over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9990.998

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.142
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it