Mechanoreceptive field and response properties of nociceptive neurons in ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus of the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The somatotopic organization, mechanoreceptive field (RF) and response properties of nociceptive neurons in the ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus (VPM) were studied in urethane/α-chloralose anesthetized rats. Microelectrode recordings were made of the activity of single neurons within VPM, and neurons were identified as either nociceptive [wide-dynamic-range (WDR), nociceptive-specific (NS)] or non-nociceptive [low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM)]. Of the 350 neurons tested, 317 responded to orofacial mechanical stimulation; all the RFs were contralateral. The incidence of NS neurons was significantly higher than that of WDR neurons (21.2% versus 4.2%) but LTM neurons were most common (62.9%). WDR and NS neurons were scattered among the LTM neurons in the VPM. NS neurons were significantly denser in rostral and caudal portions of VPM; most of the WDR neurons (87%) were located in the core of VPM. Neurons with an ophthalmic division RF were located most dorsally and those with a mandibular division RF most ventrally. The RF of most neurons (77%) was located in the maxillary region, with the RF of nociceptive neurons mainly in the intraoral region and that of most LTM neurons in the perioral region. The majority of LTM, WDR and NS neurons tested had a low spontaneous activity and there was a significant difference in spontaneous firing between WDR and NS neurons, and between WDR and LTM neurons. The mean mechanical activation threshold of NS neurons (195 ± 11.2 g) was significantly higher than that of WDR neurons (4.7 ± 1.3 g). Response magnitude and peak firing frequency to graded mechanical stimuli were significantly higher in the WDR neurons. These findings indicate significant differences in the spontaneous activity, RF and response properties between WDR and NS neurons in VPM. However, they also indicate that both types of nociceptive neurons can encode the spatial properties and intensity of a noxious orofacial stimulus and, thus, might contribute to the sensory-discriminative component of pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".