Nonsynostotic scaphocephaly: the so-called sticky sagittal suture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Scaphocephaly is a common craniofacial abnormality that results from craniosynostosis of the sagittal suture. The authors have treated a group of infants who presented with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly, or a so-called sticky sagittal suture. The purpose of this study was to describe these patients with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly, the natural history of the disease, and its treatment. METHODS: At the University of Texas-Houston Medical School between 1996 and 2002, nine patients presented with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly. When the abnormality in patients was diagnosed prior to 12 months of age, the majority (seven of eight) were successfully managed by molding helmet therapy. The only child in this group in whom this therapy failed to correct the deformity was noted on repeated computerized tomography scanning to have true sagittal synostosis, which required surgical correction. One child with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly, who presented after 1 year of age, required surgical correction followed by postoperative molding helmet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nonsynostotic scaphocephaly appear to have sagittal synostosis. If treated early (at < 12 months of age), head shape in these patients can be normalized by molding helmet therapy. Surgery is reserved for older patients (> 12 months of age) or those with sagittal synostosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".