The puzzle posed by COMMD1, a newly discovered protein binding Cu(<scp>ii</scp>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copper is critically important for cellular metabolism. It plays essential roles in developmental processes, including angiogenesis. The liver is central to mammalian copper homeostasis: biliary excretion is the major route of excretion for ingested copper and serves to regulate the total amount of copper in the organism. An extensive network of proteins manipulates copper disposition in hepatocytes, but comparatively little is known about this protein system. Copper exists in two oxidation states: most extracellular copper is Cu(II) and most, if not all, intracellular copper is Cu(I). Typical intracellular copper-binding proteins, such as the Cu-transporting P-type ATPases ATP7B (Wilson ATPase) and ATP7A (Menkes ATPase), bind copper as Cu(I). Accordingly, the recent discovery that the ubiquitous protein COMMD1 binds Cu(II) exclusively raises the question as to what role Cu(II) may play in intracellular processes. This issue is particularly important in the liver and brain. In humans, Wilson’s disease, due to mutations in ATP7B, exhibits progressive liver damage from copper accumulation; in some Bedlington terriers, mutations in COMMD1 are associated with chronic copper-overloaded liver disease, clinically distinct from Wilson’s disease. It seems unlikely that Cu(II), which generates reactive oxygen species through the Fenton reaction, has a physiological role intracellularly; however, Cu(II) might be the preferred state of copper for elimination from the cell, such as by biliary excretion. We argue that COMMD1 participates in the normal disposition of copper within the hepatocyte and we speculate about that role. COMMD1 may contribute to the mechanism of biliary excretion of copper by virtue of binding Cu(II). Additionally, or alternatively, COMMD1 may be an important component of an intracellular system for utilizing Cu(II), or for detecting and detoxifying it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".