MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104380068 · doi:10.20355/c54g6n

The iSPACES Framework for Rethinking a Culturally Responsive Secondary Science Curriculum in Tanzania

2014· article· en· W2104380068 on OpenAlex
Ladislaus M. Semali

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contemporary Issues in Education · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumTanzaniaRestructuringScience educationMathematics educationPedagogySociologyEngineering ethicsEngineeringPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The iSPACES project for teaching a culturally responsive science curriculum in Tanzania emphasizes practical skills to develop scientific knowledge among secondary school students. iSPACES employs a framework that involves interdisciplinary teaching to motivate students to study science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and to produce useful products that will fill needs encountered in real life. This discussion considers methods for restructuring an existing curriculum and rethinking the methodologies for teaching of physics, chemistry and biology (PCB) to overcome students’ cognitive conflicts between their everyday world and the world of academic science. The examination concludes with an example of a framework for a chemistry lesson that may guide teachers who wish to rethink PCB pedagogy and designers who wish to create culturally responsive curricula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it