Hematological and acid-base changes in men during prolonged exercise with and without sodium-lactate infusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An emerging technique used for the study of metabolic regulation is the elevation of lactate concentration with a sodium-lactate infusion, the lactate clamp (LC). However, hematological and acid-base properties affected by the infusion of hypertonic solutions containing the osmotically active strong ions sodium (Na(+)) and lactate (Lac(-)) are a concern for clinical and research applications of LC. In the present study, we characterized the hematological and plasma acid-base changes during rest and prolonged, light- to moderate-intensity (55% Vo(2 peak)) exercise with and without LC. During the control (Con) trial, subjects were administered an isotonic, isovolumetric saline infusion. During LC, plasma lactate concentration ([Lac(-)]) was elevated to 4 meq/l during rest and to 4-7 meq/l during exercise. During LC at rest, there were rapid and transient changes in plasma, erythrocyte, and blood volumes. LC resulted in decreased plasma [H(+)] (from 39.6 to 29.6 neq/l) at the end of exercise while plasma [HCO(3)(-)] increased from 26 to 32.9 meq/l. Increased plasma strong ion difference [SID], due to increased [Na(+)], was the primary contributor to decreased [H(+)] and increased [HCO(3)(-)]. A decrease in plasma total weak acid concentration also contributed to these changes, whereas Pco(2) contributed little. The infusion of hypertonic LC caused only minor volume, acid-base, and CO(2) storage responses. We conclude that an LC infusion is appropriate for studies of metabolic regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".