Growth in pups of the subantarctic fur seal (<i>Arctocephalus tropicalis</i>) on Amsterdam Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Growth in body mass in pups of the subantarctic fur seal Arctocephalus tropicalis was studied at Amsterdam Island, southern Indian Ocean during the rearing period between December 1995 and August 1996. We examined the change in the rates of mass gain and mass loss with pup age to explain the overall change in mass throughout the rearing period, when mothers alternate foraging trips at sea and attendance periods ashore. In the absence of their mothers, pups fast and lose mass. During the maternal attendance period ashore pups suck and gain mass. There was no significant difference in the rate of growth in mass between male and female pups. The rate of loss in mass during a fasting event was positively related to the initial body mass but negatively related to the age and duration of the fast of the pup. The rate of mass loss was best related to pup age by a quadratic relationship. The rate of mass loss increased until pups were 120 days old and then decreased until the end of the study period. The rate of gain in mass following a maternal foraging trip was positively related to the initial pup mass but negatively related to the foraging trip duration, and we found that the rate of mass gain decreased linearly with the age of the pup. The concomitant decrease in the rate of mass loss and mass gain for pups > 120 days old allowed pups to maintain a positive growth until they were 220 days old. After 220 days of age the rate of mass loss exceeded the rate of mass gain and the pups start to lose mass until weaning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".