X‐Ray and Near‐IR Variability of the Anomalous X‐Ray Pulsar 1E 1048.1−5937: From Quiescence Back to Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on new and archival X-ray and near-IR observations of the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 1048.1–5937 performed between 2001 and 2007 with the Rossi X-Ray Telescope Explorer ( RXTE ), the Chandra X-Ray Observatory , the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Explorer , the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ), and the Very Large Telescope. Monitoring with RXTE revealed that following its ~2001-2004 active period, 1E 1048.1–5937 entered a phase of timing stability; at the same time, simultaneous observations with Chandra and HST in 2006 showed that its X-ray and near-IR radiative properties, all variable prior to 2005, stabilized. Specifically, the 2006 X-ray spectrum is consistent with a two-component blackbody plus power law, with an average kt = 0.52 keV and Γ = 2.8, at a mean flux level of ~6.5 × 10 −12 erg cm −2 s −1 (2–10 keV). The near-IR counterpart in 2005-2006 was detected at H ∼ 22.7 mag and K s ∼ 21.0 mag, considerably fainter than previously measured. In 2007 March, this newfound quiescence was interrupted by sudden X-ray flux, spectral, and pulse morphology changes, simultaneous with a large glitch and near-IR enhancement. Our RXTE observations revealed a factor of ~3 increase in pulsed flux (2-10 keV), while observations with Chandra and Swift saw the total X-ray flux increase much more than the pulsed flux, reaching a peak value of >7 times the quiescent value (2-10 keV). We find a strong anticorrelation between X-ray flux and pulsed fraction, and a correlation between X-ray spectral hardness and flux. Simultaneously with the radiative and timing changes, we observed the X-ray pulse profile change significantly from nearly sinusoidal to having multiple peaks. We compare these remarkable events with other magnetar outbursts and discuss implications in the context of AXP emission models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".