Nonutility of routine testing of stool for ova and parasites in a tertiary care Canadian centre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In many clinical situations, stool examinations for ova and parasites (O&P) are routine in the work-up of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea. Frequently, these tests are found to be negative for pathogens. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic yield of routine stool testing for O&P in a Canadian tertiary care centre and to estimate the potential clinical benefit of a positive result. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All stool samples sent to the central microbiology laboratory at London Health Sciences Centre were reviewed over a 5-year period ending January 2010. Initial screening was done by direct antigen testing using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technique followed by direct microscopy for negative results where there was a high index of suspicion and for positive results to rule out any concurrent parasites not included in the EIA kit. Pathogens identified were categorized and their potential susceptibility to metronidazole was estimated. No clinical data were available, as this was purely a utilization study. RESULTS: A total of 5812 stool tests were ordered. Of these, 5681 (97.7%) were completed. The most common reasons for an incomplete test were sample leakage (n = 38) and use of the incorrect collection kit (n = 32). Direct microscopy identified white blood cells in 17% of patients with positive testing. The most common pathogen was Giardia lamblia , which was detected in 45/83 (54%) of positive specimens. Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar was identified in 16/83 (19%) and Cryptosporidium spp. in 10/83 (12%) of positive specimens. Microorganisms not thought to be pathogenic were identified in 7/83 (8%). Direct laboratory costs independent of labor were estimated at $1836 per clinically significant organism identified. Of the 77 specimens positive for pathogenic organisms, 62 (81%) were likely to be sensitive to treatment with metronidazole. CONCLUSION: In a tertiary care centre, the diagnostic yield of routine testing of stool for O&P during the evaluation of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea is low. Most clinically significant positive results should be responsive to metronidazole, but empirical treatment is not encouraged. Strategies to identify patients with a higher likelihood of harboring pathogenic parasites and consideration of empiric metronidazole therapy for patients at highest risk merit further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".