Glenohumeral Chondrolysis After Shoulder Arthroscopy Associated With Continuous Bupivacaine Infusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of glenohumeral chondrolysis associated with the use of a continuous-infusion device in shoulder arthroscopy. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic glenohumeral surgery with a postoperative continuous-infusion pump inserted into either the glenohumeral joint or subacromial space were evaluated for chondrolysis. Two pump types were used: group 1 received 100 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine without epinephrine infused at 2.08 mL/h, and group 2 received 270 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine without epinephrine infused at 4.16 mL/h. RESULTS: We followed up 65 patients at a mean of 40 months. Of these, 29 had glenohumeral catheters (13 in group 1 and 16 in group 2) and 36 had subacromial catheters (19 in group 1 and 17 in group 2). The overall postoperative Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Rowe, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were 84, 87, 77, 86, and 10, respectively, in those with glenohumeral catheters and 93, 94, 95, 89, and 11, respectively, in those with subacromial catheters. Three glenohumeral catheter patients were diagnosed with chondrolysis, all in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Chondrolysis developed in 3 of 16 patients (19%) with glenohumeral joint infusion of 0.5% bupivacaine without epinephrine at 4.16 mL/h for 65 hours. No patient using a 2.08-mL/h reservoir for 48 hours into the glenohumeral joint and no patient with a subacromial infusion device had chondrolysis. Clinical symptoms and radiographic evidence of chondrolysis developed before 12 months after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".