MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104678442 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2011.0207

Performance analysis of decode-and-forward relaying schemes with adaptive quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM)

2012· article· en· W2104678442 on OpenAlexaff
Essam Saleh Altubaishi, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsSpectral efficiencyQuadrature amplitude modulationRayleigh fadingQAMComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)FadingLink adaptationChannel state informationBit error rateIndependent and identically distributed random variablesChannel (broadcasting)WirelessAlgorithmTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringMathematicsStatisticsRandom variable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors propose two schemes to enhance the spectral efficiency of the decode-and-forward adaptive relaying with adaptive modulation. The first scheme, called the minimum error rate scheme, uses cooperative transmission all the time to achieve transmit diversity whereas the second scheme, called the maximum spectral efficiency scheme, tries to avoid cooperative transmission if the spectral efficiency cannot be improved. For each scheme, the authors introduce a policy that depends on the channel state information of each link. They provide performance analysis in terms of average spectral efficiency, average bit error rate and outage probability over independent non-identically Rayleigh fading channels. Our analysis is verified by simulation results. These results show that our proposed schemes lead to an improvement in the performance of cooperative wireless systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207