MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Context-specific memory in children with ADHD

2014· article· en· W2104709824 on OpenAlexaff
Kimberly A. Kerns, Sarah J. Macoun

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Developmental Disabilities · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyRecallCognitive psychologyContext (archaeology)Working memoryChildhood memoryDevelopmental psychologyCognitionSemantic memoryNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives:Memory for where and when information is learned, or contextual aspects of memory, as opposed to fact or item memory, has been suggested to be more dependent on frontal brain and related executive control systems. Children with neurodevelopmental disorders involving frontal brain systems have been noted to have problems on contextual memory tasks. Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have difficulties with forgetfulness and are known to have deficits in aspects of executive control with associated dysfunction in frontal brain systems; therefore, while their item memory is not typically impaired, they may have difficulty on tasks requiring contextual memory abilities. The goal of this study was to compare children with ADHD to typically developing children, on two different contextual memory tasks (source memory and memory for temporal recency) and to compare this with their respective performance on traditional fact/item memory tasks.Methods:Participants included 36 children with combined type ADHD and 36 typically developing controls ages 6–13 years, matched by age and gender. In addition to a measure of intellectual ability, children completed two different contextual memory tasks; one assessing recall for the source of new information and one assessing recall of the temporal context of information (recency). Incorporated into these tasks were standard measures of item/fact memory recall.Results:Results revealed that children with ADHD performed similarly to control participants on memory recognition tasks, but differed from controls on the contextual memory tasks. Children with ADHD outperformed control participants when recalling the source from which they had learned information, but performed more poorly than control on a task that required them to make a recency/temporal order judgment.Conclusion:The data suggest that while children with ADHD may have somewhat similar capacity to recognise new information, they differ in aspects of their performance on contextual aspects of memory. These differences are not uniform and mirror neuroscience findings supporting dissociable contextual memory systems. Potential theoretical explanations for the dissociations seen are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Developmental DisabilitiesSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207