Use of an oxygen-releasing compound to aerate eutrophic reservoir water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the use of an Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) as a slow release chemical aeration agent within eutrophic surface water systems. Bench and pilot-scale experiments involving ORC treatment of eutrophic reservoir water were conducted to determine operational properties of ORC and examine its performance as an aeration agent within a surface water environment. The bench-scale study involved the application of 10, 25 and 50 g ORC doses to 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks containing various water and sediment samples. The pilot-scale study involved a scaled up simulation of full-scale reservoir systems using large fiberglass tanks, where water quality parameters in an ORC-treated tank were compared to an untreated tank over a 4 month period. The results of these experiments indicate that the application of ORC can result in substantial increases in dissolved oxygen and pH when applied to deoxygenated water systems. Within the pilot scale study, a 300 g/m2 dose of ORC at the sediment water interface prevented the onset of anoxic conditions over a 4 month growing season period, releasing approximately 20% of its mass as oxygen within this time frame.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".