MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104742284 · doi:10.1177/1352458510367661

Disease onset in familial and sporadic primary progressive multiple sclerosis

2010· article· en· W2104742284 on OpenAlexafffund
Marcus Koch, Yinshan Zhao, Irene M. Yee, Colleen Guimond, Elaine Kingwell, A. Dessa Sadovnick, Helen Tremlett

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseAge of onsetMultiple sclerosisFamily aggregationDegenerative diseasePopulationCentral nervous system diseaseInternal medicinePediatricsImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pathophysiology of primary progressive (PP) multiple sclerosis (MS) involves diffuse axonal degeneration which is believed to start early in the disease process, even before the onset of clinical symptoms. Symptomatic onset then occurs when this process reaches a threshold after which the axonal loss can no longer be compensated. A preliminary study showed that patients with familial PPMS had an earlier clinical onset than patients with sporadic disease, suggesting a hereditary component to the disease process of PPMS. In this study, we combined data from two large, population-based, longitudinal MS databases to investigate disease onset in familial and sporadic PPMS. We examined 411 patients with PPMS. There were no differences in gender distribution or onset symptoms between familial and sporadic PPMS. Patients with familial PPMS were significantly younger at disease onset (n = 84, median age: 37.6 years) than patients with sporadic disease (n = 327, median age: 42.7, p = 0.007). This difference was due to a greater proportion of familial cases with a disease onset before the age of 30 and a smaller proportion with disease onset between 40 and 50 years of age (p = 0.002). Gender had no significant effect on the age at disease onset. Further analyses showed that these findings were unlikely to be due to ascertainment bias towards an earlier diagnosis in familial cases. Our findings suggest a hereditary component to the disease process of PPMS. It would be worthwhile to identify patients with familial PPMS for future research on disease modifying genes in MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis JournalSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207