Lu–Hf zircon and Sm–Nd whole-rock isotope constraints on the extent of juvenile arc crust in Avalonia: examples from Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avalonia, the largest accreted crustal block in the Appalachian orogen, consists of Neoproterozoic magmatic arc sequences that represent protracted and episodic subduction-related magmatism before deposition of an Ediacaran–Ordovician cover sequence including siliciclastic rocks. Zircon crystals were obtained from arc-related magmatic rocks and from clastic sedimentary sequences and analyzed in situ for their Hf-isotope composition. The majority of magmatic and detrital zircons are dominated by initial 176 Hf/ 177 Hf values that are more radiogenic than chondritic uniform reservoir (CHUR) with calculated crust formation Hf–T DM model ages that range from 0.84 to 1.30 Ga. These results suggest formation by partial melting of juvenile mantle in a Neoproterozoic continental arc. Some zircons have Hf–T DM model ages ca. 1.39–3.09 Ga with εHf values of –33.9 to –0.5 and more clearly indicate involvement of older lithosphere in their petrogenesis. Whole-rock Sm–Nd isotopic compositions from felsic volcanic rocks are characterized by positive initial εNd values with Mesoproterozoic depleted mantle model ages consistent with juvenile extraction. Results suggest a dominant mantle component with long-term light rare earth element (LREE) depletion mixed with an older crustal component with long-term LREE enrichment. The pattern of T DM model ages and variations in Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd isotopic character are compatible with a ca. 1.0–1.2 Ga igneous tectonomagmatic event that formed basement to Neoproterozoic magmatic arcs in Avalonia. The presence of evolved isotopic signatures, however, indicates that significant older Proterozoic crust is present locally beneath Avalonia, suggesting that Avalonia formed in a single Neoproterozoic arc system that generated juvenile mantle-derived crust, coupled with lesser anatectic reworking of significantly older crust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".