MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104771767 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2012.6288176

Computationally efficient tone-mapping of high-bit-depth video in the YCbCr domain

2012· article· en· W2104771767 on OpenAlexaff
Panos Nasiopoulos, Rabab Ward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTone mappingYCbCrComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceLuminanceHigh dynamic rangeColor spaceColor depthGamma correctionChrominancePipeline (software)Transformation (genetics)Dynamic rangeColor imageImage (mathematics)Image processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High dynamic range (HDR) video content is able to provide superior picture quality. This is because the representation of HDR signals requires more bits than the 8-bit low dynamic range (LDR) video. Tone-mapping is the process that converts HDR to LDR signals. Most tone-mapping methods are derived only for the luminance component. This mapping function is then used in each of the R, G and B components to generate the LDR color image. This color tone mapping correction approach, however, cannot be directly applied to most videos since they are usually encoded in the YCbCr color space. This paper addresses this problem and proposes a tone-mapping method that is applied directly on the YCbCr signals. Experimental results show that the Cb and the Cr signals generated by our method are almost identical to those produced with the conventional pipeline up to round-off errors, with average PSNR at about 55 dB and average SSIM at 0.991. By avoiding all the round-off errors introduced in the conventional method, our approach provides a more accurate LDR picture. Moreover, the proposed solution has significantly lower complexity because it bypasses the processes such as color space transformation and up-sampling which are required by the conventional method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207