Localization of prostaglandin synthase type-1 (PGHS-1) mRNA and prostaglandin synthase type-2 (PGHS-2) mRNA in ovine myometrium and endometrium throughout gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased prostaglandin production by tissues in the sheep uterus and placenta are thought to be important for the onset of parturition. In the sheep placenta, this is most likely due to increased expression of prostaglandin synthase type-2 (PGHS-2) rather than prostaglandin synthase type-1 (PGHS-1). However, there is no information concerning expression of PGHS isoenzymes in maternal uterine tissues during pregnancy. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to examine the expression of PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 in the sheep myometrium and endometrium during late gestation using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Using (35)S-labelled oligonucleotide probes, which give specific hybridization signals in other tissues, we localized PGHS-2 mRNA to endometrial epithelium, and apparently to other cells in both endometrium and myometrium. This artefactual signal was still present with 100-fold excess unlabelled oligonucleotide probe and with sense probes, but was resolved with the use of (33)P-oligonucleotides. Using (33)P-labelled oligonucleotide probes we could not detect either PGHS-1 or PGHS-2 mRNA in myometrium, and found expression only of PGHS-2 mRNA in endometrium. PGHS-2 mRNA localized to the endometrial epithelium and was undetectable in glandular epithelium. The level of PGHS-2 expression rose significantly between days 80 and 85 of pregnancy and term, and this corresponded to the appearance of immunoreactive PGHS-2 protein, measured by immunohistochemistry, in the endometrial epithelium. Therefore we conclude that (33)P-labelled probes are preferred for detection of mRNAs encoding PGHS-2 in ovine uterine tissues. Expression of PGHS-2 mRNA is greater than that of PGHS-1, increases during gestation, and predominates in the endometrial epithelium, consistent with the site of PGHS-2 protein localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".