MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104836306 · doi:10.1186/2054-3581-1-17

The Canadian Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome (CHILDNEPH) Project: Overview of Design and Methods

2014· article· en· W2104836306 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Susan Samuel, Shannon D. Scott, Catherine Morgan, Allison Dart, Cherry Mammen, Rulan S. Parekh, Alberto Nettel‐Aguirre, Allison A. Eddy, Rachel Flynn, Maury Pinsk, Andrew Wade, Steven Arora, Geneviève Benoît, Martin Bitzan, Robin L. Erickson, Guido Filler, Pavel Geier, C. Girardin, Silviu Grisaru, James B. Tee, Kyle Kemp, Michael Zappitelli

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcMaster UniversityWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleCanadian Child Health Clinician Scientist ProgramUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMedicineNephrotic syndromeObservational studyFocus groupNephrologyProspective cohort studyKidney diseaseHealth carePediatricsQualitative researchFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome is a commonly acquired kidney disease in children that causes significant morbidity due to recurrent episodes of heavy proteinuria. The management of childhood nephrotic syndrome is known to be highly variable among physicians and care centres. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study is to determine centre-, physician-, and patient-level characteristics associated with steroid exposure and length of steroid treatment. We will also determine the association of dose and duration of steroid treatment and time to first relapse as a secondary aim. An embedded qualitative study utilizing focus groups with health care providers will enrich the quantitative results by providing an understanding of the attitudes, beliefs and local contextual factors driving variation in care. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study; prospective observational cohort (quantitative component), with additional semi-structured focus groups of healthcare professionals (qualitative component). SETTING: National study, comprised of all 13 Canadian pediatric nephrology clinics. PATIENTS: 400 patients under 18 years of age to be recruited over 2.5 years. MEASUREMENTS: Steroid doses for all episodes (first presentation, first and subsequent relapses) tracked over course of the study. Physician and centre-level characteristics catalogued, with reasons for treatment preferences documented during focus groups. METHODS: All patients tracked prospectively over the course of the study, with data comprising a prospective registry. One focus group at each site to enrich understanding of variation in care. LIMITATIONS: Contamination of treatment protocols between physicians may occur as a result of concurrent focus groups. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative and qualitative results will be integrated at end of study and will collectively inform strategies for the development and implementation of standardized evidence-based protocols across centres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207