Wavelet transform cardiorespiratory coherence for monitoring nociception
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) may provide anesthesiologists with a noninvasive tool for nociception monitoring during general anesthesia. A novel wavelet transform cardiorespiratory coherence (WTCRC) algorithm was used to calculate estimates of the linear coupling between heart rate and respiration. WTCRC was tested on clinical data from 19 pediatric patients receiving general anesthesia during dental surgery. WTCRC decreased during nociception, and increased following additional anesthetic drugs. Data were divided into categories with normal respiratory rate (RR) (in the HF band) and low RR (in the LF band), then split into 2-minute windows. WTCRC and LF/HF were calculated for each window and compared in each category. The algorithms showed correlations of −0.5506 and −0.1403 for data with normal and low RR, respectively. WTCRC and LF/HF are comparable when the RR is normal, and WTCRC significantly outperforms when the RR is low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it