MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104875657 · doi:10.1109/ias.2005.1518498

Analysis of the charge imbalance occurring on a body in free flight

2005· article· en· W2104875657 on OpenAlexaff
Z. Kucerovsky, W.D. Greason

Bibliographic record

VenueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharge (physics)Faraday cageAtomic physicsFaraday cupWork (physics)PhysicsElectric chargeComputational physicsMaterials scienceIonThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our study deals with the magnitude of electrostatic charge supported by a metal body moving through gas. The work deals with the charge exchange phenomena between the metal, charged body and the gas through which the body travels. In our past work, we have found that a complex interaction takes place under these conditions, that results in possibility for charge imbalance occurring whenever the ballistic method is used, depending on the potential of the moving body. Our present experimental technique was based on the measurements of the charge on a test body driven at varying speed through air, carbon dioxide, or nitrogen, with the charge being measured by induction method and by a static Faraday vessel. The experiments were analyzed statistically and the effect of the moving charge magnitude was determined for the given set of gas media. The charge magnitudes ranged from +1 /spl times/ 10/sup -8/ to +8 /spl times/ 10/sup -8/ C, and the velocity of the charged body varied from 5 to 200 m /spl middot/ s/sup -1/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005.Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207