MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104926349 · doi:10.1039/b705551j

Metal based drugs: from serendipity to design

2007· review· en· W2104926349 on OpenAlexaff
Simon P. Fricker

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerendipityDrug discoveryCisplatinDrugContext (archaeology)NanotechnologyRational designDrug designChemistryAnticancer drugPharmacologyCombinatorial chemistryComputational biologyMedicineBiologyMaterials scienceBiochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The platinum anticancer drug cisplatin has made a major contribution to the treatment of testicular and ovarian cancer. This chance discovery has been the stimulus for research into other metal-based drugs. Inorganic chemistry offers many opportunities for medicinal chemistry, and the discovery of metal-based drugs has moved on from chance discovery to rational drug design. There are however, many challenges associated with the drug discovery and development process. The aim of this review is to provide case histories exemplifying the role of rational drug design in modern inorganic medicinal chemistry in the context of these challenges. The evolution of platinum drugs from cisplatin to third generation drugs is described. The molecular target for the platinum agents is DNA. Alternative molecular targets such as thiol-containing proteins and redox processes are proposed. The example of a simple, safe, efficacious metal-based drug, Fosrenol, is reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations406
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207