MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104928280 · doi:10.1080/01496395.2013.872146

Recovery of Astaxanthin from<i>Paracoccus</i>NBRC 101723 using Ultrasound-Assisted Three Phase Partitioning (UA-TPP)

2014· article· en· W2104928280 on OpenAlexaff
Jyoti A. Chougle, Rekha S. Singhal, Oon‐Doo Baik

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstaxanthinChemistryAcetoneExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyBiomass (ecology)Particle sizeFreeze-dryingPhase (matter)ButanolSolventEthanolFood scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Astaxanthin (AX) is a high valued ketocarotenoid having numerous applications in the food and pharmaceutical industry. The present study is a combined approach of using ultrasound extraction with three phase partitioning for an efficient recovery of Astaxanthin from Paracoccus NBRC 101723. The optimum conditions for the ultrasonic extraction of AX were: 100% amplitude for 20 s (wet biomass) and 60 s (dried biomass) using solid to solvent ratio (1:2) at a distance of 15 mm between the base of the extraction vessel and the tip of the probe. Pretreatment of the dried biomass (particle size 0.8 μm) with 70% acetone (70°C, 25 min) resulted in maximum ultrasonic extraction of 1035 μg/g of dried biomass. The astaxanthin content (μg/g) extracted using dried biomass, dried using different drying methods showed hot air oven drying at 35°C (946 ± 23) to be comparable to freeze drying (950 ± 19) and vacuum oven drying (945 ± 22). Astaxanthin from the disrupted cells recovered by three phase partitioning using (NH4)2SO4 and t-butanol (40°C, 30 min) resulted in 37% more recovery than conventional method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeparation Science and TechnologySame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207