Bibliographic record
Abstract
China’s radio and television has always been an industry with strong policy, as a field of which the government strictly controls. At present, the special status of broadcast industry which should take account for both public interests and marketization is affected by the policies due to the nature of institution and enterprise management. Digital pay-TV as a part of broadcast industry cannot be exclusive. The government administration is defined as “a series of management and regulation behaviors which legal regulatory agencies are relatively independent as well taken by administrators (mainly enterprise) according to certain laws and regulations”. The purpose of such restriction is to overcome market failures to maintain a favorable environment for a normal economic development. Government administration of digital pay-TV refers to government manage and control the premium channels in the means of economy, legislation, and administration in order to overcome or compensate the failure of market mechanism in resource allocation to ensure the reasonable allocation of market interests. Government’s role is to create a more rational policy environment strengthening the management and standard to the market, increasing the intensity of macroeconomic regulation, to create a favorable external environment for premium channels. However, the administration is not so satisfying that in the following it will be analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".