Attitude et distance sociale des élèves non handicapés à l’égard de leurs pairs handicapés.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche visait un double objectif. Il s’agissait, d’une part, de s’interesser a la dimension comportementale de l’attitude des eleves non handicapes scolarises dans un cadre inclusif a l’egard de leurs camarades handicapes et de reperer la distance sociale qu’ils maintiennent avec eux et, d’autre part, d’etudier l’effet des facteurs contact, visibilite et importunite du handicap sur l’evolution de cette attitude et de cette distance sociale. Cinq cent quarante-neuf eleves de cinq colleges scolarisant des eleves presentant des handicaps correspondant a l’interaction des facteurs visibilite et importunite (trisomie 21, deficience intellectuelle, infirmite motrice et cerebrale et trouble des apprentissages) ont rempli un questionnaire en debut et en fin d’annee. Les resultats montrent que les eleves ont des attitudes favorables a l’egard de leurs pairs handicapes, mais qu’ils maintiennent cependant une distance sociale avec eux. Ils indiquent egalement que les attitudes et la distance sociale evoluent en cours d’annee en fonction de l’interaction des facteurs etudies. La scolarisation en milieu ordinaire d’eleves presentant un handicap visible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".