MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105145812 · doi:10.1306/060801720146

Shallow Burial Dolomitization and Dedolomitization of Cenozoic Cool-Water Limestones, Southern Australia: Geochemistry and Origin

2002· article· en· W2105145812 on OpenAlexaff
T. K. Kyser, Noel P. James, Yvonne Bone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsDolomitizationGeologyCenozoicGeochemistryPaleontologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Gambier Limestone, a bryozoan-rich, cool-water carbonate of Late Eocene to Early Miocene age in the Otway basin of southeastern Australia, is about one-third variably dolomitized limestone and dolostone. Individual dolomite crystals range from 10 to 500 μm and are of three types: (1) silt-size crystals (4-64 μm diameters) having a brightly luminescent core (10-20 μm) of nearly stoichiometric dolomite with ∼ 1 mol% MnCO3 and SiO2 but no Fe, surrounded by a thin, dull or alternating dark and bright CL cortex that is nonstoichiometric with 44-46 mol % MgCO3 but sharp to diffuse zoning in Mn and Fe, (2) sand-size crystals, which also have a brightly luminescent and stoichiometric core and dark and bright non-stoichiometric thin inner cortex, but are mostly a thick outer cortex (at ca. > 50 μm diameter) that is nonluminescent and nonstoichiometric with some Fe but no Mn, and (3) identical sand-size crystals with a variably leached core and inner cortex that is either a void or a void filled with late calcite cement. These three crystal populations represent two distinct dolomites and their alteration product. The smallest of the silt-size crystals, which are rarely preserved, are also the cores of the larger crystals upon which grew an inner and outer cortex of somewhat different composition. The δ18O values of dolomite rhombs (−1.6 to 2.9 ‰) correlate positively with δ13C values (0.7 to 3.0‰), with the lowest values from silt-size or small sand-size crystals and the highest values from large sand-size crystals with leached, unfilled cores. Low and variable δ18O and δ13C values in conjunction with high and variable Mn and Fe contents in both the core and inner cortex of all crystals are consistent with formation from a mixture of brackish water and seawater. Higher values for the outer cortex in sand-size crystals are typical of those expected for precipitation from normal or near-normal seawater. Low Sr, Mn, and Fe contents in the largest crystals, in conjunction with fluid inclusions of seawater salinity in the outer cortex, are also consistent with the bulk of the large crystals having precipitated from seawater. Using the Sr-isotope evolution curve for Cenozoic seawater, Sr-isotope ratios of the dolomites can be divided into four distinct groups, which correspond to times of major transgressions. This Cenozoic example, in which dolomite petrography and crystal chemistry can be explained in terms of simple transgression-regression, offers a simple sedimentological explanation for many similar dolomites where processes of formation cannot be so easily constrained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207