Measurement of MAP kinase activation by flow cytometry using phospho‐specific antibodies to MEK and ERK: Potential for pharmacodynamic monitoring of signal transduction inhibitors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cancer cells frequently show abnormal signaling via the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) pathway due to increased activity of surface receptors for growth factors, or as a result of ras mutations. The development of potent anti-cancer agents that target this pathway prompts the need for analytical methods that allow pharmacodynamic monitoring of drug effects in patients during early phase clinical trial. We describe such a method, based on the activation of T-lymphocytes in undiluted peripheral blood using phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Following rapid hypotonic lysis and formaldehyde fixation, activation of the MAP kinase pathway can then be demonstrated using phospho-specific antibodies that recognize the activated mediators MEK or ERK, followed by surface labeling with anti-CD3 to identify T-lymphocytes. This method was used to investigate the effects of a MEK inhibitor, U0126, and a new raf kinase inhibitor BAY 37-9751 in blood samples from normal donors. Dose-dependent inhibition of pERK activation was demonstrated for both agents. Furthermore, differential effects on pMEK activation allowed the molecular targets of the two inhibitors to be distinguished. In addition to monitoring drug effects in patients during treatment with inhibitors of the MAP kinase pathway, the general methodology described in this paper has the potential for wide application to the study of signal transduction at the single cell level using flow cytometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it