Talcosis Associated with IV Abuse of Oral Medications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the CT appearance of talcosis associated with IV abuse of oral medications and to compare the findings of talcosis related to methylphenidate with those findings seen with other drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CT scans of 12 patients with talcosis (seven men, five women), 33-54 years old (mean age, 44 years), were analyzed retrospectively. Seven patients had abused methylphenidate; five patients had no history of abuse. The diagnosis of talcosis was made histologically in 11 patients and at funduscopy in one patient. CT was performed with 1- to 1.5-mm collimation (n = 10 patients) or 5- to 10-mm collimation (n = 2). RESULTS: The predominant abnormalities seen on CT consisted of a diffuse fine nodular pattern (n = 2), a combination of nodules and lower lobe panacinar emphysema (n = 3), and ground-glass attenuation (n = 2). Emphysema was the only abnormality seen in the remaining five patients (lower lobe panacinar, n = 4; upper lobe centrilobular, n = 1). No significant difference in the prevalence of nodules and ground-glass attenuation was seen between the methylphenidate and non-methylphenidate groups. Lower lobe panacinar emphysema was more common in methylphenidate abusers (six [86%] of seven patients) than in non-mnethylphenidate drug abusers (one [20%] of five, p<0.05, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: The CT manifestations of talcosis consist of a fine micronodular pattern, ground-glass attenuation, and emphysema. A significantly increased prevalence of lower lobe panacinar emphysema is seen in IV drug addicts who abuse methylphenidate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".