MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105245948 · doi:10.1126/science.1240578

Distinguishable Epidemics of Multidrug-Resistant <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium DT104 in Different Hosts

2013· article· en· W2105245948 on OpenAlexaff
Alison E. Mather, S. W. J. Reid, Duncan J. Maskell, Julian Parkhill, María Fookes, Simon R. Harris, Derek Brown, John Coia, M. R. Mulvey, Matthew W. Gilmour, Liljana Petrovska, Elizabeth de Pinna, Makoto Kuroda, Masato Akiba, Hidemasa Izumiya, Thomas R. Connor, Marc A. Suchard, Philippe Lemey, D. J. Mellor, Daniel T. Haydon, Nicholas R. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesEuropean CommissionNational Institute of General Medical SciencesEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryWellcome TrustUniversity of GlasgowNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyMultiple drug resistanceSalmonellaAntibiotic resistancePhylogenetic treeGenomeTransmission (telecommunications)GeneGenotypeAntimicrobialMicrobiologyBacteriaGeneticsDrug resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global epidemic of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 provides an important example, both in terms of the agent and its resistance, of a widely disseminated zoonotic pathogen. Here, with an unprecedented national collection of isolates collected contemporaneously from humans and animals and including a sample of internationally derived isolates, we have used whole-genome sequencing to dissect the phylogenetic associations of the bacterium and its antimicrobial resistance genes through the course of an epidemic. Contrary to current tenets supporting a single homogeneous epidemic, we demonstrate that the bacterium and its resistance genes were largely maintained within animal and human populations separately and that there was limited transmission, in either direction. We also show considerable variation in the resistance profiles, in contrast to the largely stable bacterial core genome, which emphasizes the critical importance of integrated genotypic data sets in understanding the ecology of bacterial zoonoses and antimicrobial resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations348
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207