Bidirectional Buffer-Aided Relay Networks With Fixed Rate Transmission—Part II: Delay-Constrained Case
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the second part of a two-part paper considering bidirectional relay networks with half-duplex nodes and block fading where the nodes transmit with a fixed transmission rate. In Part I, it was shown that a considerable gain in terms of sum throughput can be obtained by optimally selecting the transmission modes or, equivalently, the states of the nodes, i.e., the transmit, the receive, and the silent states, based on the qualities of the involved links. To enable adaptive transmission mode selection, the relay has to be equipped with two buffers for storage of the data received from the two users. The protocol proposed in Part I was delay unconstrained and provides an upper bound for the performance of practical delay-constrained protocols. In this paper, we propose two heuristic but efficient delay-constrained protocols, which can approach the performance upper bound reported in Part I, even in cases where only a small delay is permitted. The proposed protocols not only consider the instantaneous qualities of the involved links for adaptive mode selection but also take the states of the queues at the buffers into account, i.e., the number of packets in the queues. The average throughput and the average delay of the proposed delay-constrained protocols are evaluated by analyzing the Markov chain of the states of the queues. Numerical results show that the proposed protocols outperform existing bidirectional relaying protocols for delay-constrained transmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it