MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105286251 · doi:10.1542/pir.28-5-e23

Learning in Practice and Maintaining Certification in Pediatrics

2007· article· en· W2105286251 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terry Kind, John T. Benjamin, John Parboosingh, Emil Rothstein, R Perelman, Mary Carol Badat, Henry H. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatrics in Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationContext (archaeology)Maintenance of CertificationLifelong learningMedical educationMedicinePediatricsPsychologyFamily medicinePedagogyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Terry Kind, MD, MPH* 2. John T. Benjamin, MD† 3. John Parboosingh, MD‡ 4. Edward Rothstein, MD§ 5. Robert Perelman, MD** 6. Mary Carol Badat, MAdEd** 7. Henry Bernstein, DO†† 1. *Children's National Medical Center, Division of General Pediatrics & Community Health, Washington, DC 2. †Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 3. ‡Office of Professional Development, Royal College of Physicians & Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 4. §Pennridge Pediatric Associates, Sellersville, Pa 5. **American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Ill 6. ††Dartmouth Medical School, Children's Hospital at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH As the 21st century unfolds, a broader, more comprehensive program for maintaining certification has been created for pediatricians that includes the concept of lifelong learning with dynamic self-assessments in a clinical context. (1) It is called the Program for Maintenance of Certification in Pediatrics (PMCP®), and pediatricians will be asked by the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) to comply with all of the specific requirements of this program starting in 2010. (2) Pediatricians can work toward meeting the requirements for maintaining certification through their learning in practice. Questions arise every day in clinical practice that should stimulate learning and foster professional development. (3) These questions establish a basis for personal learning, which benefits the practitioner while ultimately improving patient care. Adult learners each bring different experiences and motivations to their professional development needs and create their own blend of lifelong learning opportunities and preferences. The purpose of this article is to explore the evolution and importance of the concept of self-directed continuous professional development (CPD) and the link to maintenance of certification (MOC) as it fits within the context of real-time clinical pediatric practice. Although physicians enter and complete medical school during a finite time period, they continue as students of medicine throughout their careers. (4) In a study of medical oaths from the first century to present day, fewer than half of those analyzed included a commitment to lifelong learning, and most that did incorporate this commitment were not emphasized in medical schools. (5) The recent calls for reform in the certification process and the shift from continuing medical education (CME) to CPD are driven by a need for lifelong learning as well as the importance of factors such as patient safety, clinician professionalism, and ensuring clinical competence. (6) The changing health-care environment, new demands of clinical practice, …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatrics in ReviewSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207