Ectopic Notch Activation in Developing Podocytes Causes Glomerulosclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic evidence supports an early role for Notch signaling in the fate of podocytes during glomerular development. Decreased expression of Notch transcriptional targets in developing podocytes after the determination of cell fate suggests that constitutive Notch signaling may oppose podocyte differentiation. This study determined the effects of constitutive Notch signaling on podocyte differentiation by ectopically expressing Notch's intracellular domain (NOTCH-IC), the biologically active, intracellular product of proteolytic cleavage of the Notch receptor, in developing podocytes of transgenic mice. Histologic and molecular analyses revealed normal glomerular morphology and expression of podocyte markers in newborn NOTCH-IC-expressing mice; however, mice developed severe proteinuria and showed evidence of progressive glomerulosclerosis at 2 wk after birth. Features of mature podocytes were lost: Foot processes were effaced; expression of Wt1, Nphs1, and Nphs2 was downregulated; cell-cycle re-entry was induced; and the expression of Pax2 was increased. In contrast, mice with podocyte-specific inactivation of Rbpsuh, which encodes a protein essential for canonical Notch signaling, seemed normal. In addition, the damaging effects of NOTCH-IC expression were prevented in transgenic mice after simultaneous conditional inactivation of Rbpsuh in murine podocytes. These results suggest that Notch signaling is dispensable during terminal differentiation of podocytes but that constitutive (or inappropriate) Notch signaling is deleterious, leading to glomerulosclerosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".