Sex Differences in Ambulatory Visits for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Based on the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1995 to 2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a rapidly growing public health problem in the United States. It is unclear whether men and women differ in their utilization of ambulatory care or medications prescribed for COPD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sex-related trends in physician-office and out-patient department COPD visits from 1995 through 2004. METHODS: We pooled data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to derive national estimates of out-patient ambulatory COPD visits. For trend analysis we stratified the data into 2-year periods and by sex. The main variables of interest were the number of out-patient visits for COPD, patient characteristics, comorbidities, and medications prescribed. RESULTS: From 1995 to 2004, COPD-related out-patient visits increased among women and men; oral corticosteroids and short-acting bronchodilators were the most commonly prescribed drugs for both women and men; and prescriptions for inhaled corticosteroid decreased in both women (from 20% to 11%) and men (from 20 to 17%). In 2004, women surpassed men in out-patient COPD visits. CONCLUSIONS: COPD visits increased among both sexes, but the upward trend in COPD visits among women indicates that COPD is no longer a male-dominated disease. Providers should be aware of this shift in patient demographics and the differences between the sexes in COPD management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".