Effect of ionic strength on bubble coalescence in inorganic salt and seawater solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bubble size is of fundamental importance in the flotation process, as it provides the surface area for particle collection. Typically, weak surfactants (frothers) are added to process water to reduce bubble coalescence. Certain inorganic electrolytes, which occur naturally in some flotation process water, have been shown to mimic the role of frothers. The concentration at which bubble coalescence is inhibited, the critical coalescence concentration, was determined in a 5.5‐L mechanical flotation cell for a series of coalescence inhibiting inorganic salts. To mimic some industrial flotation process water, a synthetic sea salt solution was also tested. It was found that when the multicomponent sea salt solution was broken down into its constituent parts, the addition of the ionic strength of each ion correlated well with the overall ionic strength curve of all the salts tested. The critical coalescence ionic strength ranged from 0.22 to 0.35, with sea salt being 0.26. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 2489–2496, 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".