MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2105424475 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.120327

Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated Antigen 4 Ig-induced Asthma in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

2012· letter· en· W2105424475 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jun Bao, Ting Li, Jing Zhao, Caiying Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCD80ImmunologyCytotoxic T cellCD86Rheumatoid arthritisImmune systemT cellAntigenCytokineArthritisCD28AbataceptMajor histocompatibility complexAntibodyCD40BiologyRituximabIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: The CD28-CD80/CD86 costimulatory pathway is essential in enhancing and optimizing T cell activation and cytokine production in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) is a homolog of CD28. It can competitively bind to CD80/CD86 and downregulate naive and memory T cell proliferation, cytokine production, and humoral immune response. Its human soluble fusion protein, CTLA4-Ig, was approved for the treatment of active RA by the US Food and Drug Administration in 20051. Several animal studies suggest benefits of CTLA4-Ig in other immunologic diseases such as asthma. However, we describe here 2 cases of RA complicated with relapse of asthma while undergoing CTLA4-Ig therapy. A 53-year-old Chinese woman had a 9-year history of refractory RA, and was treated with methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 mg per week and prednisone 3 mg daily. She had started CTLA4-Ig 10 mg/kg in combination with stable dosages of MTX and prednisone on August 20, 2009, because of her high RA activity. Four days later, … Address correspondence to Dr. J. Bao; E-mail: baojun{at}smmu.edu.cn

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0130.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→