Ethnocultural Reproduction and Attitudes towards Cohabiting Relationships*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se fondant sur des notions d'interculturalité et de changement social, cet article fournit une explication des différences ethnoculturelles dans les attitudes à l'endroit des relations de cohabitation hétérosexuelle chez les jeunes adultes canadiens. L'accent est mis sur la mise au jour des mécanismes clés par lesquels les groupes ethniques « reproduisent » des orientations teintées de traditionalisme ou de libéralisme à l'endroit de ces conditions de logement. L'ensemble de données utilisé dans cette recherche est tiré d'un sous‐ensemble de 1 907 jeunes adultes choisis au hasard dans la Culture and Coresidence Study de 1999–2000. Les analyses à deux variables montrent de fortes différences ethnocuturelles dans la propension à déclarer que la cohabitation est acceptable, les Britanniques étant les plus favorables, suivis des Européens du Sud, des Chinois et enfin des Indo‐Canadiens. Les réultats de l'analyse de régression logistique révèlent qu'une constellation de facteurs ethnocul‐turels concourent à ces différences, par exemple la religiosité des jeunes adultes, le traditionalisme dans la famille et le rôle assignéà chacun des sexes, ainsi que l'usage quotidien d'une langue ethnique avec son entourage. From a cross‐cultural and social change perspective, this paper explicates ethnocultural differences in attitudes towards heterosexual cohabiting relationships among Canadian young adults. The focus is on uncovering the key mechanisms by which ethnic groups “reproduce” traditional or liberal value orientations towards this living arrangement. The data set used in this research is drawn from a sub‐set of 1,907 randomly‐selected young adults from the 1999–2000 Culture and Coresidence Study. Bivariate analyses show strong ethnocultural differences in the propensity to report that cohabitation is acceptable, with the British group the most favourable, followed by Southern Europeans, Chinese, and finally, Indo‐Canadians. Results from the logistic regression analysis reveal that a constellation of ethnocultural factors contribute to these differences. These include: young adult's religiosity, familism and gender‐role traditionalism, and routine use of ethnic language with peers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".