Thrombophilia and the Risk for Hemodialysis Vascular Access Thrombosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascular access thrombosis is the most common and costly complication in hemodialysis patients. The role of thrombophilia in access thrombosis is not established. A case-control study was conducted of 419 hemodialysis patients to determine whether thrombophilia was associated with arteriovenous fistula or graft thrombosis. Participants were enrolled from three in-center and five satellite dialysis units associated with a Canadian academic health science center that provides dialysis services in a catchment area of one million. Patients were tested for factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, factor XIII genotype, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, factor VIII, homocysteine, and lipoprotein (a) concentrations. Overall, 59 (55%) patients with access thrombosis had at least one thrombophilia compared with 122 (39%) patients without access thrombosis (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 2.98). After controlling for important risk factors, the association between any thrombophilia and access thrombosis remained (adjusted OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.99). For each additional thrombophilic disorder, the odds of access thrombosis increased significantly (adjusted OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.61). This study suggests that thrombophilia is associated with access thrombosis in dialysis patients. Large, multicenter, prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm the observations from this case-control study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".