Expression of PRPF31 and TFPT: regulation in health and retinal disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRPF31, a gene located at chromosome 19q13.4, encodes the ubiquitous splicing factor PRPF31. The gene lies in a head-to-head arrangement with TFPT, a poorly characterized gene with a role in cellular apoptosis. Mutations in PRPF31 have been implicated in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), a frequent and important cause of blindness worldwide. Disease associated with PRPF31 mutations is unusual, in that there is often non-penetrance of the disease phenotype in affected families, caused by differential expression of PRPF31. This study aimed to characterize the basic promoter elements of PRPF31 and TFPT. Luciferase reporter constructs were made, using genomic DNA from an asymptomatic individual with a heterozygous deletion of the entire putative promoter region. Fragments were tested by the dual-luciferase reporter assay in HeLa and RPE-1 cell lines. A comparison was made between the promoter regions of symptomatic and asymptomatic mutation-carrying individuals. A patient (CAN493) with adRP was identified, harbouring a regulatory region mutation; both alleles were assayed by the dual-luciferase reporter assay. Luciferase assays led to the identification of core promoters for both PRPF31 and TFPT; despite their shared gene architecture, the two genes appear to be controlled by slightly different regulatory regions. One functional polymorphism was identified in the PRPF31 promoter that increased transcriptional activation. The change was not, however, consistent with the observed symptomatic-asymptomatic phenotypes in a family affected by PRPF31-adRP. Analysis of the mutant promoter fragment from CAN493 showed a >50% reduction in promoter activity, suggesting a disease mechanism of functional haploinsufficiency-the first report of this disease mechanism in adRP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".