Parents' experiences of midwife‐managed care following the loss of a baby in a previous pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY: This article reports on research that explored the impact of the Special Delivery Service, a midwife-managed intervention, developed as an addition to routine care to support and educate high-risk pregnant women and their partners subsequent to the death of a baby in a previous pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Approximately 40,000 families suffer the trauma of a neonatal death* annually in the USA, while statistics for Canada and Australia give similar numbers relative to population. Since many more babies die than those accounted for in these statistics, through stillbirth, miscarriage and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, more than the above-cited 2% of childbearing couples will face the trauma of the loss of a baby. RATIONALE: The resultant threat that this situation may pose to the health of the mother has been extensively documented in the literature. However, despite the recent growth in knowledge about the impact of perinatal loss and bereavement, few interventions are specifically designed to support Australian and Canadian women and their partners during a pregnancy following the loss of a baby. METHODOLOGY: This phenomenological study explored women's and their partners' experiences of grief and loss and the support offered to them through the Special Delivery Service programme. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: In the face of funding and organizational changes to both the Australian and Canadian health care systems that have eliminated or reduced some services, this research reinforced the need for individualized, compassionate midwifery care and the urgent need for genuinely empathic and supportive health care services for these women and their partners. It also emphasized the need for couples to be informed and supported so that gender differences in grieving do not become a divisive element in the relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The findings have implications for both nurses and midwives in their practice in countries where optimum care of this vulnerable population is not routinely available. The research supports midwife-managed models of care to ensure women and their families are appropriately supported in crisis. The findings provide insight also into the diverse grief response among couples and the difficulties experienced in a pregnancy following the loss of a baby.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".