MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105686851 · doi:10.1021/ar000056y

Understanding Nature's Strategies for Enzyme-Catalyzed Racemization and Epimerization

2002· review· en· W2105686851 on OpenAlexaff
Martin E. Tanner

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStereocenterRacemizationChemistryEpimerStereochemistryEnzymeDeprotonationMechanism (biology)StereoselectivityCatalysisEnantioselective synthesisBiochemistryPhilosophyOrganic chemistryEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epimerases and racemases are enzymes that catalyze the inversion of stereochemistry in biological molecules. In this article, three distinct examples are used to illustrate the wide range of chemical strategies employed during catalysis, and the diverse set of ancestors from which these enzymes have evolved. Glutamate racemase is an example of an enzyme that operates at an "activated" stereocenter (bearing a relatively acidic proton) and employs a nonstereospecific deprotonation/reprotonation mechanism. UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase acts at an "unactivated" stereocenter and uses a mechanism involving a nonstereospecific elimination/addition of UDP. L-Ribulose phosphate 4-epimerase also acts at an unactivated stereocenter and uses a nonstereospecific retroaldol/aldol mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations197
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207