MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105767349 · doi:10.1136/gut.2006.119065

No evidence of persisting measles virus in the intestinal tissues of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

2007· letter· en· W2105767349 on OpenAlexafffund
Yasmin D’Souza, Serge Dionne, Ernest G. Seidman, Alain Bitton

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCrohn's and Colitis Foundation of CanadaCrohn's and Colitis Foundation
KeywordsMeasles virusMeaslesInflammatory bowel diseaseVaccinationPathogenesisMedicineAutismVirusDiseaseImmunologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

and increased body weight appropriately. Tissue samples showed a progressive increase in the amount of cell infiltrate in the matrix (table 1, fig After 2 weeks, acute inflammation was replaced by full-thickness ingrowths of capillaries and myofibroblasts. Epithelial regeneration into the anastomosis was first seen at 2 weeks, and well-formed branching crypts were seen at 4 weeks of transplantation. Goblet cells and absorptive cells with brush border were present at 4 months of transplantation. Morphologically intact regenerated mucosa extending across the anastomosis to the grafts was observed at 6 months of transplantation. To date, there is limited literature on the bioengineered intestine. Vacanti et al, 6-8 developed a cystic structure in which neomucosa forms in a biodegradable polymer in rodents. Once formed, the neointestinal cyst is anastomosed in continuity with the native bowel without causing feeding problems, but some animals had small bare areas of the cysts that lacked neomucosa. 7 We did not report such bare areas in our model; furthermore, there was progressive growth of the neomucosa in the ADM over time. It is possible that immediate contact of the ADM scaffold with the intestinal structures and with luminal content provided trophic stimuli for the new intestinal segment. 9 Another possible factor for the observed growth in our model may be the effects of small-bowel resection on the development of neointestine. It is well known that post resection gut mucosa growth factors have a stimulatory effect on intestinal regeneration. 10 In conclusion, we have demon- strated that ADM can be successfully used as a scaffold to generate a bioartificial new intestinal segment in vivo, and we propose this method as a basis for developing new intestinal elongation techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207