MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105777366 · doi:10.1051/rnd:2000132

A biphasic action of estradiol on estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in the lamb uterus

2000· article· en· W2105777366 on OpenAlexaff
A. Meikle, M. Forsberg, Lena Sahlin, Britt Masironi, C. Tasende, Marcelo Rodríguez-Piñón, E.G. Garófalo

Bibliographic record

Venueannales de biologie animale biochimie biophysique · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
FundersMedical Research CouncilSveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
KeywordsReceptorEstrogen receptorEstrogenInternal medicineEndocrinologyCytosolProgesterone receptorEstrogen-related receptor gammaBiologyEstrogen receptor betaEstrogen receptor alphaEstrogen-related receptor alphaNuclear receptorEnzymeBiochemistryMedicineGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regulation of the uterine expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors was studied in 20 three-month-old lambs that were not treated or treated with estradiol- 17beta. Determinations of receptors were performed by binding assays in the nuclear and cytosolic fractions, receptor mRNAs by solution hybridization, and estrogen receptor protein by an enzyme-immunoassay. Estradiol treatment decreased the receptor binding capacity of both receptors and the levels of immunoreactive estrogen receptor 12 h after injection in the absence of decreased receptor mRNAs, suggesting that the initial decrease is due to degradation of the proteins or that mRNAs are translated into new receptor proteins at a reduced rate. The mRNA levels increased after estradiol treatment suggesting that the replenishment phase consists of synthesis of new receptors rather than recycling of inactivated receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueannales de biologie animale biochimie biophysiqueSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207