A biphasic action of estradiol on estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in the lamb uterus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regulation of the uterine expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors was studied in 20 three-month-old lambs that were not treated or treated with estradiol-17β.Determinations of receptors were performed by binding assays in the nuclear and cytosolic fractions, receptor mRNAs by solution hybridization, and estrogen receptor protein by an enzyme-immunoassay.Estradiol treatment decreased the receptor binding capacity of both receptors and the levels of immunoreactive estrogen receptor 12 h after injection in the absence of decreased receptor mRNAs, suggesting that the initial decrease is due to degradation of the proteins or that mRNAs are translated into new receptor proteins at a reduced rate.The mRNA levels increased after estradiol treatment suggesting that the replenishment phase consists of synthesis of new receptors rather than recycling of inactivated receptors. estrogen / progesterone / receptor / uterus / lambRésumé -Action biphasique de l'œstradiol sur l'expression des récepteurs aux œstrogènes et à la progestérone dans l'utérus de l'agnelle.La régulation de l'expression des récepteurs aux œstrogènes et à la progestérone au niveau de l'utérus a été étudiée chez des agnelles immatures âgées de 3 mois (n = 20), traitées et non traitées avec œstradiol-17β.Les déterminations des récepteurs ont été faites par des essais de liaison dans les fractions nucléaires et cytosoliques, les ARNm des récepteurs par la méthode d'hybridation en solution et la protéine du récepteur aux œstrogènes par un essai immuno-enzymatique.Le traitement à l'œstradiol réduit la capacité de liaison des deux récepteurs et les niveaux des récepteurs aux œstrogènes immunoréactifs 12 h après l'injection en absence d'une diminution des ARNm des récepteurs, suggèrent que la réduction initiale est due à la dégradation des
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".