MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105900440 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2010.2055610

Gain-Enhanced Distributed Amplifier Using Negative Capacitance

2010· article· en· W2105900440 on OpenAlexafffund
Aliakbar Ghadiri, Kambiz Moez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsFully differential amplifierDirect-coupled amplifierDistributed amplifierAmplifierGain–bandwidth productOpen-loop gainCapacitorElectrical engineeringOperational amplifierCapacitanceRF power amplifierBandwidth (computing)Parasitic capacitanceElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsComputer scienceEngineeringCMOSPhysicsTelecommunicationsVoltageElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new high-gain structure for the distributed amplifier. Negative capacitance cells are exploited to ameliorate the loading effects of parasitic capacitors of gain cells in order to improve the gain of the distributed amplifier while keeping the desired bandwidth. In addition, the negative capacitance circuit creates a negative resistance that can be used to increase the amplifier bandwidth. Implemented in 0.13-μm IBM's CMRF8SF CMOS, the proposed six-stage distributed amplifier presents an average gain of 13.2 dB over a bandwidth of 29.4 GHz. The measured input return loss is less than -9 dB and the output return loss is less than -9.5 dB over the entire bandwidth. With a chip area of 1.5 mm × 0.8 mm, the amplifier consumes 136 mW from a 1.5-V dc power supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207