Nonlinear Optical Properties of Semiconductor Nanowires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The orientation dependency of nonlinear optical effects, including the second-harmonic generation (SHG) and third-harmonic generation (THG), as well as two-photon luminescence, in semiconductor nanowires (NW) are described. The mismatch of dielectric constants between nanostructures and their environment governs the rise of optical nonlinearities causing SHG even in materials with a high symmetry crystal lattice that would not generate second harmonic in the bulk state. Due to the depolarization effects, the intensity of the optical electric field inside illuminated NWs depends dramatically on their orientation related to the exciting light polarization. As a result, rotation of the light polarization causes giant angular dependency of all the mentioned optical phenomena, with the maximum relative amplitude at the electric-field polarization oriented along the NWs. Simultaneous measurements of two-photon-induced luminescence, SHG and THG in ZnSe NWs are presented. In accordance with the theory, the angular dependencies of nonlinear phenomena were observed and influence of the environmental dielectric constant on the magnitude of the nonlinear signals was demonstrated. The relative amplitudes of the angular dependencies were also significantly influenced by NW bending and nonuniformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".