The angiopietin-1–Tie2 pathway prevents rather than promotes pulmonary arterial hypertension in transgenic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of the angiopoietin-1 (Ang1)-Tie2 pathway in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is controversial. Although Ang1 is well known to prevent endothelial activation and injury in systemic vascular beds, this pathway has been suggested to mediate pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. Therefore, we used transgenic models to determine the effect of increased or decreased Tie2 activity on the development of PAH. We now report modest spontaneous elevation in right ventricular systolic pressure in Tie2-deficient mice (Tie2(+/-)) compared with wild-type (WT) littermate controls, which was exacerbated upon chronic exposure to the clinically relevant PAH triggers, serotonin (5-HT) or interleukin-6 (IL-6). Moreover, overexpression of Ang1 in transgenic mice had no deleterious effect on pulmonary hemodynamics and, if anything, blunted the response to 5-HT. Exposure to 5-HT or IL-6 also decreased lung Ang1 expression, further reducing Tie2 activity and inducing pulmonary apoptosis in the Tie2(+/-) group only. Similarly, cultured pulmonary artery endothelial cells subjected to Tie2 silencing demonstrated increased susceptibility to apoptosis after 5-HT treatment. Finally, treatment of Tie2-deficient mice with Z-VAD, a pan-caspase inhibitor, prevented the pulmonary hypertensive response to 5-HT. Thus, these findings firmly establish that endothelial survival signaling via the Ang1-Tie2 pathway is protective in PAH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".