Patient Characteristics Associated with Nocturnal Emergency Department Visits for Asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To identify patient characteristics associated with nocturnal emergency department (ED) visits for asthma. METHODS: Asthmatic patients 18 to 55 years of age who visited Ontario EDs between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004, were identified through an administrative clinical database. Patients' time of ED presentation was analyzed for circadian pattern using histogram and polynomial regression. Risk of nocturnal visit (presentation at the ED between midnight and 8 AM) was modeled through generalized estimating equations with patient age, gender, and asthma severity level as covariates. The effect of nocturnal visit on return rate to the ED within 14 days after the initial visit was determined through Cox regression. RESULTS: During study period there were 31,490 ED visits for asthma made by 23,253 patients. Their time of ED visits displayed a distinct circadian pattern with peak between 7 and 8 PM, and trough at 5 AM. Approximately 22% of visits (6,868) occurred at night. Men had higher odds of presenting at night than women (OR 1.61; 1.49-1.73). Patients with mild asthma were significantly less likely to visit the ED at night than patients with moderate or severe asthma. Nocturnal presentation was not associated with higher odds of subsequent returns to the ED (HR 1.00; 0.89-1.14). CONCLUSION: Higher odds of nocturnal visits in men suggest the existence of gender-differences in health-seeking behavior in asthmatics. Although nocturnal visits are associated with more severe asthma, they do not lead to higher return rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".