p62 expression in primary carcinomas of the digestive system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To characterize p62 expression and define the relationship between p62 expression and cell proliferation in primary carcinomas of the digestive system.METHODS: p62 expression was characterized in surgically resected tumor specimens from 60 patients with primary carcinomas of the digestive tract (including 22 esophageal carcinomas, 17 gastric carcinomas, and 21 colorectal carcinomas) and 40 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The cell proliferation was determined by IHC of Ki-67 in 40 patients with HCC.RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of esophageal carcinomawere histopathologically diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma. We combined the gastric and colorectal carcinomas based on the equivalent histology. The 38tumors in the combined groups, consisted of 17 welldifferentiated, eight moderately differentiated, nine poorly differentiated carcinomas, and four mucinous adenocarcinomas. According to the criteria of Edmondson and Steiner, 40 patients with HCC were graded (2 grade Ⅰ, 17 grade Ⅱ and 21 grade Ⅲ). p62 expression in primary carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract (60/60,100%)was higher than that (27/40, 67.5%) of HCC (P＜0.01,χ2 = 19.63). High expression levels of p62 were positively correlated with histological grades in gastric and colorectal carcinomas (P＜0.0001) and inversely associated with those in HCC (P = 0.0322). No significant correlations were observed for esophageal carcinomas (P = 0.8246).p62 expression was also detected in the cytoplasm of morphologically normal columnar epithelial cells adjacent to the cancer foci of gastric and colorectal carcinomas.In 40 HCC specimens, the mean Ki-67 labeling index (LI)was (19.6±16.0)%. It was (28.3±18.73)% in 12 cases with high p62 expression (+++), (7.53±14.83)% in 13 cases without p62 expression(-). Patients with a high p62expression showed a significantly higher level of Ki-67 staining than those without p62 expression (P＜0.05, t = 2.069).CONCLUSION: p62 expression is common in carcinomas of the digestiv
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".