MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106086789 · doi:10.1080/14772000.2012.664574

Unveiling cryptic species of the bumblebee subgenus<i>Bombus s. str.</i>worldwide with COI barcodes (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

2012· article· en· W2106086789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystematics and Biodiversity · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBumblebeeSubgenusSpecies complexTaxonDNA barcodingApidaeZoologyEcologyHymenopteraBombus terrestrisTaxonomy (biology)PollinatorPollinationPollenPhylogenetic tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bumblebees of the subgenus Bombus s. str. dominate (or used to dominate) many north temperate pollinator assemblages&#13;\nand include most of the commercial bumblebee pollinator species. Several species are now in serious decline, so&#13;\nconservationists need to know precisely which ones are involved. The problem is that many Bombus s. str. species are&#13;\ncryptic, so that species identification from morphology may be impossible for some individuals and is frequently misleading&#13;\naccording to recent molecular studies. This is the first review of the entire subgenus to: (1) avoid fixed a priori assumptions&#13;\nconcerning the limits of the problematic species; and (2) sample multiple sites from across the entire geographic ranges of&#13;\nall of the principal named taxa worldwide; and (3) fit an explicit model for how characters change within an evolutionary&#13;\nframework; and (4) apply explicit and consistent criteria within this evolutionary framework for recognising species. We&#13;\nanalyse easily-obtained DNA (COI-barcode) data for 559 sequences from 279 localities in 33 countries using general mixed&#13;\nYule-coalescent (GMYC) models, assuming only the morphologically distinctive species B. affinis Cresson, B. franklini&#13;\n(Frison), B. ignitus Smith and B. tunicatus Smith, and then recognise other comparable COI-barcode groups as putative&#13;\nspecies. These species correspond to modified concepts of the taxa B. cryptarum (Fabricius), B. hypocrita P´erez, B.&#13;\njacobsoni Skorikov, B. lantschouensis Vogt n. stat., B. longipennis Friese, B. lucorum (Linnaeus), B. magnus Vogt, B.&#13;\nminshanensis Bischoff n. stat., B. occidentalis Greene, B. patagiatus Nylander, B. sporadicus Nylander, B. terrestris&#13;\n(Linnaeus) and B. terricola Kirby (a total of 17 species). Seven lectotypes are designated. Our results allow us for the first&#13;\ntime to diagnose all of the putative species throughout their global ranges and to map the extent of these geographic ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it