Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease associated with polyglutamine expansion in huntingtin, a widely expressed protein. The function of huntingtin is unknown although huntingtin plays a fundamental role in development since gene targeted HD (-) (/-)mouse embryos die shortly after gastrulation. Expression of huntingtin is detected in spleen and thymus but its role in hematopoiesis has not been examined. To determine the function of huntingtin and to provide insight into potential pathologic mechanisms in HD, we analyzed the role of huntingtin in hematopoietic development. Expression of huntingtin was analyzed in a variety of hematopoietic cell types, and in vitro hematopoiesis was assessed using an HD ( +/-)and several HD( -) (/-)embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Although wild-type, HD ( +/-)and HD( -) (/-)ES cell lines formed primary embryoid bodies (EBs) with similar efficiency, the numbers of hematopoietic progenitors detected at various stages of the in vitro differentiation were reduced in HD ( +/-)and HD( -/-)() ()ES cell lines examined. Expression analyses of hematopoietic markers within the EBs revealed that primitive and definitive hematopoiesis occurs in the absence of huntingtin. However, further analysis using a suspension culture in the presence of hematopoietic cytokines demonstrated a highly significant gene dosage-dependent decrease in proliferation and/or survival of HD ( +/-)and HD( -) (/-)cells. Enrichment for the CD34(+)cells within the EB confirmed that the impairment is intrinsic to the hematopoietic cells. These obser- vations suggest that huntingtin expression is required for the generation and expansion of hematopoietic cells and provides an alternative system in which to assess the function of huntingtin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".