Prolonged immobilization compromises up‐regulation of repair genes after tendon rupture in a rat model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It was hypothesized that mobilization vs immobilization after injury would promote tissue healing by regulating gene expression for molecules associated with repair. Cast immobilization vs free mobilization was studied after rat Achilles tendon rupture. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was performed at 8 and 17 days post-rupture to assess different growth factors [brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), nerve growth factor (NGF) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)] and inflammatory mediators [cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX 1 and COX 2), inducible nitric oxide synthase and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha)] in the healing region. At 8 days post-injury, tendon mRNA levels were comparable in both groups. However, by day 17, the mRNA levels for BDNF, bFGF, COX 1 and HIF-1alpha in the mobilized group had increased significantly. Corresponding mRNA levels in the immobilized group decreased during the same period. There were no significant differences in the expression of NGF, IGF-1 or COX 2 between the different groups, indicating that injury-associated expression of these molecules is not overtly influenced by loading. This study supports the notion that prolonged immobilization post-rupture hampers the healing process by compromising the up-regulation of repair gene expression in the healing tendon. It might be speculated that a shorter period of immobilization, i.e. 1 week, would not impair the healing process significantly. The findings support the current development of earlier and more active rehabilitation programs after tendon injuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".