Molecular Epidemiology of CTX-M-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> in the Calgary Health Region: Emergence of CTX-M-15-Producing Isolates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was designed to describe the molecular epidemiology of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli over a 6-year period (2000 to 2005) in a large well-defined Canadian region with a centralized laboratory system. Molecular characterization was done by isoelectric focusing, PCR, and automated sequencing, while genetic relatedness was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with XbaI. Of the 552 viable extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli isolates isolated, 354 (64%) were positive for blaCTX-M genes associated with ISEcp1; 211 produced CTX-M-14, 128 produced CTX-M-15, 5 produced CTX-M-2, 4 produced CTX-M-3, 4 produced CTX-M-24, and 2 produced CTX-M-27. CTX-M-positive isolates were significantly more resistant to the fluoroquinolones than CTX-M-negative isolates, while CTX-M-15 producers were more likely to be resistant to gentamicin and tobramycin. There was a predominance of CTX-M-14 during the first 4 years of the study period, with community outbreaks associated with cluster 14A during 2000, 2001, and 2003. A substantial increase in CTX-M-15 producers occurred during the last 18 months and was due to clusters 15A and 15AR (where AR indicates related to A) in the hospital and nursing home sectors. Our results demonstrate that the persistence and dissemination of CTX-M genes among E. coli populations in larger geographic health care regions is dynamic, with the continuous emergence of clonally related CTX-M-15. This study illustrates the importance of molecular surveillance in tracking CTX-M-producing E. coli strains in the community and investigating their influx into hospitals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".